Vehicle validation
CSV, MF4, GPS, event markers
Compare signal behavior across variants, campaigns, and release candidates.
- baseline runs
- variant comparison
- release evidence
Engineering use cases
AurigaTrace turns raw vehicle logs into traceable project evidence for validation, calibration, diagnostics, ADAS, connected-vehicle pilots, and engineering report reviews.
9
use-case families
rules
threshold evidence
reports
review output
Use-case command center
Project
vehicle program or validation campaign
Logs
CSV, JSONL, ASC + DBC active; MF4 preview; BLF roadmap
Signals
sample count, min, mean, max, windows
Rules
thresholds, duration gates, severity
Report
review evidence and AI-assisted narrative
Use-case portfolio
Each use case starts with raw evidence, moves through parser and signal processing, and ends with findings, reports, or AI-assisted narratives that remain tied to the source project and log file.
CSV, MF4, GPS, event markers
Compare signal behavior across variants, campaigns, and release candidates.
CSV, MF4, calibration exports
Identify threshold breaches, sustained-duration events, and operating-window drift.
charging CSV, current, voltage, thermal data
Review AC/DC charging profiles, current behavior, thermal limits, and fault events.
battery voltage, current, SOC, pack temperature
Track endurance trends, cell/pack limits, SOC behavior, and thermal exposure.
ASC + DBC active, BLF/CAN FD roadmap
Move from text trace intake to decoded signal review and network anomaly findings.
scenario CSV, GPS, CAN, ROS bag roadmap
Tie sensor/control/event logs to scenario evidence and review-ready findings.
brake pressure, wheel speed, steering, stability control
Review threshold events and correlated signals for stability-control evidence.
Android logcat, DLT, service logs, DTC exports
Connect software logs and service events with diagnostic findings and report notes.
CSV, JSON, GPS, DTC, operational telemetry
Validate ingest patterns, fleet metrics, and repeatable reporting for pilot programs.
Decision workflow
The same flow supports a charging campaign, CAN trace review, software diagnostic event, or ADAS scenario: define the question, register the evidence, normalize it, evaluate rules, and attach the conclusion to a report.
Vehicle program, campaign, scenario, or diagnostic concern.
Upload raw logs, preserve source metadata, and assign project scope.
Use parser capability to produce signals, statistics, and windows.
Run thresholds, duration gates, and severity logic against statistics.
Inspect observed values, rules, status, and engineering impact.
Generate review-ready report evidence and controlled AI draft context.
Use-case matrix
A strong log platform should make it obvious which log families are active today, which parser work is next, and what decision artifact each domain produces.
CSV signal statistics, JSON/JSONL telemetry summaries, ASC + DBC foundation parsing, project rules, findings, reports, sample projects, and the format registry are already usable. BLF and MF4/MDF are the next strongest implementation slices for deeper network and measurement use cases.
| Use case | Log evidence | Platform workflow | Decision output |
|---|---|---|---|
| Validation | CSV / MF4 / GPS | signal statistics + rule findings | variant readiness |
| Calibration | measurement channels | operating windows + duration gates | threshold review |
| Charging | voltage / current / thermal | profile checks + fault correlation | charging evidence |
| Battery | SOC / pack temperature | trend review + endurance summary | durability report |
| Network | ASC + DBC / BLF roadmap | active text trace parser + timing rules | CAN anomaly review |
| ADAS | scenario / event / GPS | event alignment + report context | scenario evidence |
| Diagnostics | DLT / logcat / DTC | software event review | service finding |
| Fleet | JSON / CSV / telemetry | pilot ingest + KPI reporting | fleet summary |
Engineering cockpit
Engineers do not need another static dashboard. They need a traceable cockpit that connects signal windows, observed values, thresholds, finding status, and report readiness.
signals
processed evidence
rules
threshold checks
findings
review status
reports
decision record
Use-case cockpit
| Signal | Observed | Context | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| battery_current | -12.7 A | regen window | review |
| motor_temp_c | 67.1 C | thermal band | ok |
| brake_pressure | 86.0 bar | limit breach | warning |
| can_period_ms | 12.7 ms | period drift | warning |
| vehicle_speed | 88.4 km/h | scenario speed | ok |
Team views
Validation, calibration, diagnostics, and report-review users can work from the same project data without losing role boundaries or evidence provenance.
Inspect project runs, compare signals, evaluate thresholds, and build evidence for release decisions.
Review operating limits, duration gates, control-window drift, and repeatability across test runs.
Correlate software logs, DTC exports, bus events, and service behavior into reviewable findings.
Use approved statistics, rule findings, and controlled AI drafts to prepare consistent reports.
Login to inspect the current sample workspace, or submit a pilot request with your project, log families, parser needs, and report workflow.